This way to the TOP
Euthanasia at the Christian Witness Ministries Web Site
Christian Witness Ministries

Euthanasia
— a good death?
By PETER BARNES

THE word literally means ‘good death’, and it is often presented in terms of ‘mercy killing’. Sir Mark Oliphant, who was a distinguished scientist and a former Governor of South Australia, thought that euthanasia should not be a crime but a right. Isaac Asimov has stated the case for the pro-euthanasia position:

No decent human being would allow an animal to suffer without putting it out of its misery. It is only to human beings that human beings are so cruel as to allow them to live on, in pain, in hopelessness, in living death, without moving a muscle to help them.

Phrased like that, euthanasia seems the only compassionate thing to do, but Asimov sees no distinction between human beings and animals (like the movie They Shoot Horses, Don’t They?), and sees no positive value in suffering. The former Victorian (Australia) premier, Jeff Kennett, went further and advocated euthanasia on the grounds that it was a ‘beautiful experience.’

Some Definitions
We need to clarify some definitions before we look at this issue in greater detail:

  • (a) Euthanasia refers to the intentional taking of life for ‘compassionate’ motives, whether by act or omission. It is not a right to die but a right to be killed.
  • (b) Passive euthanasia usually denotes the cessation of treatment that is regarded as futile. Brian Pollard, who is opposed to euthanasia, does not regard this as euthanasia at all. In fact, to call it ‘euthanasia’ is either mistaken or mischievous. It is every person’s common law right to refuse any medical treatment (except for food and fluids), and doctors may not provide treatment without express consent. For example, it is not euthanasia for a cancer patient who is very ill to refuse any more chemotherapy.
  • (c) Voluntary euthanasia is euthanasia carried out at the request of the patient.
  • (d) Involuntary euthanasia is euthanasia in defiance of a request that it not be done.
  • (e) Non-voluntar y euthanasia is euthanasia where there has been no request by the person (the person may be immature, mentally incompetent, in a coma, or simply not asked).
  • (f) Medically-assisted suicide occurs where the doctor provides the means for a person to commit suicide.
The Current Situation in Australia and Elsewhere
From September 1996 to March 1997 the Northern Territory allowed a patient to request his doctor to assist the patient to terminate his life if he (the patient) was experiencing unacceptable pain or distress. The decision was to be ratified by a second medical practitioner. This legislation was overturned by the intervention of the federal government. In NSW there have been a number of attempts to pass similar legislation; indeed, attempts to introduce pro-euthanasia are fast becoming annual events.
In Holland it has been widely practised. In September 1991 it emerged that euthanasia had been practised in about 20% of all deaths, with much falsification of death certificates. Just over one quarter of the doctors in Holland admitted that they had killed patients without any request at all. Lawmakers talk about ‘strict safeguards’ but they do not exist and cannot exist. Children as young as twelve can demand euthanasia in Holland, and can over-ride their parents’ wishes.
It is worth remembering that the first society in modern times to usher in euthanasia laws was Nazi Germany. It was widely practised in the 1930s, and became law in 1939. Ultimately, some 275,000 persons were exterminated, for being mentally defective, psychotics, epileptics, paralytics, or sufferers from Parkinson’s Disease and multiple sclerosis. As Leo Alexander commented:

The beginnings at first were merely a subtle shift in emphasis in the basic attitude of physicians. It started with the attitude, basic in the euthanasia movement, that there is such a thing as a life not worthy to be lived. This attitude in its early stages concerned itself merely with severely and chronically sick. Gradually, the sphere of those to be included in this category was enlarged to encompass the socially unproductive, the ideologically unwanted, the racially unwanted and finally all non-Germans.
We are but a short step from Nazi Germany. C. Everett Koop (US Surgeon- General under President Reagan) is not alone in warning: ‘Auschwitz could be in the offing.’ Michael Burleigh in his compelling book, Death and Deliverance, has shown that the euthanasia mentality in Germany did not suddenly emerge with Nazism; there had been a long period of preparation for it.
Biblical Texts Bearing on Euthanasia
The basic text has to be ‘You shall not murder’ (Ex.20:13). Voluntary euthanasia could not be classified as first-degree murder, but it undermines the sanctity of human life. When the emotionally-drained Elijah asked for death, God refused his request (1 Kings 19).
The Bible gives two accounts of assisted suicide — that of Abimelech (Judges 9:53ff) and that of King Saul. In the latter case, the soldier who claimed to kill Saul was in turn killed by David (2 Sam.1:5-10). Both of these deaths are portrayed as judgments by God. It is God who has appointed us to die (Heb.9:27). He promises to uphold those who trust Him, even in old age (Isa.46:3-4 c/f Psalm 71 with 37:25).
Euthanasia is a repudiation of this promise. The Christian knows that the wearing out of the body can go hand-in-hand with spiritual growth (2 Cor.4:16). An old and incapacitated person, for example, may have a valuable prayer ministry.
Our bodies are not our own to do with them as we will (1 Cor.6:19-20). At the basis of the push for euthanasia is humanism. Hence, as Nigel deS. Cameron points out: ‘The old axis of sanctity-of-life and healing is rapidly being replaced by a new one of quality of-life and relief of suffering.’ In the name of compassion and mercy, there is death and degradation. Humanism declares that it promotes the well-being of human beings, but in fact it devalues their worth. It is inevitable that those who hate God love death (Prov.8:36).
Practical Problems with Euthanasia
Even without the biblical texts as our authority, it is clear that there are many practical problems associated with euthanasia:
  • a. The diagnosis may be incorrect as doctors are fallible beings. They work with limited knowledge. Your garage mechanic makes mistakes, and so does your doctor.
  • b. The prognosis may be difficult to determine. We need to listen to C. Everett Koop on these first two points: ‘I recognize full well the chance for errors in judgment. Because of that I try to err only on the side of life.’ God is not mocked in anything. In March 1999 a cancer patient named June Burns was used in political advertisements to advocate euthanasia.
    She fought back tears and pleaded for people to end her suffering. All this was financed by the Voluntary Euthanasia Society of NSW. However, this had changed radically by the end of the year as she had unexpectedly picked up, and wanted to go on living.
  • c. Patients may be depressed for a time e.g. Joni Eareckson just after her diving accident in 1967 which left her paralysed, and again in 1991 when she had blood pressure problems, weight loss, infections, and pressure sores on her sides and back. On both occasions she felt quite suicidal. In 1967 she even felt angry that she could not per form the deed herself. How a patient feels today may bear little relation to how he or she feels tomorrow.
  • d. Patients may feel themselves to be a burden. They may feel guilty if they do not co-operate in the ending of their own lives.
  • e. Pressure from relatives or carers. Euthanasia legislation opens the door to selfishness and greed. Any practice which is based on the assumption that human nature is all sweetness and light is bound to come to grief.
  • f. Pressure from a lack of resources. Euthanasia legislation will invariably foster the notion that we are worth what we cost — a degrading notion, surely.
  • g. Effects on doctors, nurses, carers and relatives. Doctors will be called upon to save lives at one time and take them at another. Not too many abortionists make good paediatricians. The same principle will operate for doctors and others involved in euthanasia.
  • h. The difficulty in determining motives. Human nature is corrupt (Jer.17:9), and legislation that rejects that is dangerously naîve.
Alternatives to Euthanasia
With modem palliative care, almost all severe pain can be effectively relieved. As Brian Pollard has said, the aim ought to be not to eliminate the person in distress but the distress in the person. To choose God is to choose life for God is the God of life (Deut.30:11-20). It is ironic indeed that the generation that has so much power to lessen pain is the generation that is so keen to advocate and embrace death.

About
the Author...




[ TOP ] ...  [ BACK ]

Appeared in CETF 28 2004
"...contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints" -- Jude v3


NEW! Must read!
Details HERE...
Here is the latest - well worth the read.
Order HERE..

© Copyright 2005 Christian-Witness Ministries, except where noted. All rights reserved

-Last revised-Thursday, July 07, 2005